Independent and reader-supported. Some links are affiliate links — see our disclosure. Codes vary by province, state and city: confirm with your local fire authority.
Check this now if your panel still dials over a copper line

Central Station Monitoring and Alarm Communicators

Telguard · Napco StarLink Canada & United States $ · About USD $30–$100 a month for monitoring

A cellular or IP communicator sends alarm, supervisory and trouble signals from the fire panel to a listed monitoring centre, which calls the fire department. Phone companies retiring copper lines is the main issue in this category right now.

Why we like it

  • Monitoring runs about USD $30–$100 a month
  • Dual-path communicators report the failure of either path, so a dead connection does not go unnoticed
  • Supervised signalling means a lost connection is itself flagged

Watch out for

  • Panels still dialling over copper phone lines need migrating as telcos retire them
  • Only listed monitoring centres count — UL 827 in the US, ULC-S559 in Canada
Best for

Any building where code requires a supervised fire alarm or sprinkler system, and any owner whose panel still uses copper phone lines.

Read the full market guide — costs, install effort and alternatives ↓
Market guide

The whole commitment, end to end

What this actually is, what the market looks like, what it really costs, and how much of your time it wants — before you spend anything.

Buying it Easy
Installing it Moderate
Living with it Trivial
Up front

Communicator hardware and installation: No reliable public figure — get quotes.

Lead time

Days to a few weeks through your dealer

Time to install

Hours

How it works

The communicator connects to the fire panel's dialler or relay outputs and transmits signals over LTE cellular and/or the internet. A dual-path unit uses both and reports when either fails. Signals go to a listed monitoring centre, which verifies and calls the fire department. The link is supervised: if the communicator stops checking in, that loss of contact is itself treated as a reportable condition.

Who needs it

Required where codes mandate supervised fire alarm or sprinkler monitoring — NFPA 72 Chapter 26 in the US; the National Building Code and ULC-S561 in many Canadian occupancies.

Codes, standards and listings

Canada
Monitoring centres listed to ULC-S559; monitoring connection per ULC-S561, required in many occupancies under the National Building Code.
United States
Communicators listed to UL 864; monitoring centres listed to UL 827; monitoring per NFPA 72 Chapter 26.

What the market looks like

Telguard and Napco (StarLink) make communicators sold through security distributors to licensed installers. Owners normally deal with their fire alarm dealer or monitoring company, which supplies the communicator and the monitoring contract together. The pressing issue is the retirement of copper phone lines (POTS): older panels that dial out over a landline need a listed cellular or IP communicator.

Features that actually matter

Cellular and IP paths
LTE and/or internet transmission replaces the old phone-line dialler.
Dual-path supervision
Reports the failure of either path, so one dead link does not leave the building silently unmonitored.
Listed monitoring centre
UL 827 in the US, ULC-S559 in Canada. An unlisted security monitoring service does not meet fire code.
Alarm, supervisory and trouble signals
Not just fire alarms — a closed sprinkler valve or a panel fault is reported too.

What it really costs

Up front
Communicator hardware and installation: No reliable public figure — get quotes.
Consumables
None. Cellular service is normally bundled in the monitoring fee.
What else you'll need
Reprogramming the panel and testing that signals reach the centre.
Over five years
Monitoring at USD $30–$100 a month (≈ CAD $40–$140) is roughly USD $1,800–$6,000 over five years.

Monthly monitoring range from a US contractor cost guide (2025–2026); CAD figures converted from USD at ~1.38; we found no Canadian contractor pricing to check them against. No communicator hardware price was found.

How it differs from the alternatives

Versus copper phone line dialling
Copper is being retired. A listed cellular/IP communicator is the replacement, and supervising the path is more reliable than hoping a landline still works.
Single versus dual path
Dual path costs more but means the building is not silently unmonitored when one network goes down.
01

Buying it

Effort Easy

Where: Not sold to end users in practice. Through your fire alarm dealer or monitoring company; communicators reach licensed installers via security distributors.

Lead time: Days to a few weeks through your dealer

Ask your monitoring company in writing how your panel currently transmits. If the answer is a phone line, ask for a migration quote.

02

Installing it

Effort Moderate

Time: Hours

You'll need: Licensed fire alarm installer

Installed at the panel and tested end to end with the monitoring centre.

03

Living with it

Effort Trivial

Annual test alongside the alarm system, confirming that signals actually arrive at the station.

If not this, then what

  • Keeping the copper diallerNot a long-term option as telcos retire POTS lines.
  • Single-path cellular communicatorLower cost where the code and authority accept it.

Caveats

  • Telcos are retiring copper phone lines; panels dialling over them should be migrated to listed cellular/IP communicators.
  • Canadian monthly figures are converted from US pricing; not verified against Canadian providers.
Our verdict

Monitoring is cheap relative to everything else in a fire alarm system. The thing to act on is the copper line: if your panel still dials out over one, get it on a listed cellular or IP communicator before the line goes dead.

We don't take payment for placement and we don't sell these products. If you think we've got something wrong here, tell us — we'll correct it.

Need this installed or serviced? Find a licensed contractor near you →